A fascinating new book, The Nature of Technology: What It Is and How It Evolves, by the economist W. Brian Arthur, was just published that challenges much of the conventional wisdom that we hold about the relationship between science and technology.? Most notably, the notion that science is the horse to technology’s cart; in other words, scientific advancement results in technological innovation.

Dr. Arthur turns this notion on its ear by arguing that, in fact, the evolution of science could not occur without relevant technological discoveries.? Though science would still exist in some form with its foundation in human curiosity, exploration, and deduction, it would be primitive compared to where it is today were it not for the emergence of new technologies that enable breakthroughs that allow us to access information beyond our narrow sensory, cognitive, and physical capabilities. Think electron microscope, computer, hydrogen-fueled rocket, and particle accelerator. Inventions such these free our intellect and creativity from their all-too-human shackles by expanding the universe of what is possible. Because it’s impossible to imagine the impossible, technology makes what was inconceivable and puts it within our sight and our grasp. Without the necessary technology, the questions that would advance science could not be pondered.

To read the rest of my post, please visit my Techshrink blog at computerworld.com.